Home

    What is a naturopathic doctor?

    Education & training of a naturopath

    What is the CANP?

    How do I find a naturopathic doctor?

    Warning: No regulation in Colorado of NDs

    Legislative Update

    Supporter sign up

    Media Update

    Corporate Sponsors

    Colorado Association of Naturopathic Physicians

    Contact info

     

     Regulation of a medical profession protects the public and ensures the quality of care provided

    “Where there is no official recognition and regulation, you will find plotters, the thieves, the charlatans operating on the same basis as the conscientious practitioners… Frankly such conditions cannot be remedied until suitable safeguards are erected by law, or by the profession itself, around the practice of Naturopathy.”

    Benedict Lust circa 1902

    founding father of naturopathy.

     

    Warning

    Traditional naturopathic doctors

    Ensure public safety

    The Brian O'Connell Case

    'Naturopath' Pleads Guilty....

    Video on the value of licensing

     

    Public Harm

    Our association fully endorses the conclusions reached by the State of Colorado in their recent report. In the 2005 "Sunrise Review of Naturopathic Physicians," the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) concluded that the unregulated practice of naturopathic medicine in Colorado endangers the health, safety and welfare of the public. This is the primary sunrise criterion required in order for Colorado to consider regulating a profession. DORA listed nine examples of harm and injury that resulted people seeing practitioners who claimed to be naturopathic doctors. Our association has tried to warn the state of this problem  for years.

     

    Need for Regulation

    DORA's Sunrise Review concluded that the public needs and can reasonably be expected to benefit from an assurance of initial and continuing professional competence:

    “Few people have the time or expertise to investigate a health care practitioner's education or credentials. One of the purposes of regulation is to assure a minimal level of education and competency. State regulation assists the consumer in choosing a provider with appropriate training and skills by issuing licenses only to those the state deems minimally competent.”

      The CANP fully endorses this recommendation.

    The Problem

    Many people who use natural remedies describe themselves as naturopaths or "Traditional Naturopaths," but they are not naturopathic doctors. Their training varies from no formal training to correspondence courses to possibly some apprenticeship. Only naturopathic doctors have four years of graduate residential training in US accredited schools.

     

    The State of Colorado does not regulate the practice of naturopathic medicine. Without regulation, there is no standard imposed upon individuals who use the title naturopath, naturopathic doctor, naturopathic physician or naturopathic medical doctor. There is no government oversight or review of practitioners to ensure that they are adequately trained and competent in their skills. There are no procedures in place that prevent incompetent or morally challenged individuals from practicing as naturopathic doctors. There is no review board or other entity with which patients can file complaints against these individuals for presumed malpractice. Nor are there rules requiring practitioners to carry malpractice insurance in order to provide remuneration to consumers should a case of harm occur.

     

    In recent years, public demand for naturopathic doctors has grown rapidly. The accredited training programs and quality of training have grown along with demand.  Contributing to the problem of unqualified practitioners is the proliferation of correspondence courses that award diplomas without adequate standards or rigor.

    Traditional Naturopathic Doctors

    Traditionally, naturopathic doctors have been educated at in-resident four-year programs. Under the tutelage of licensed doctors, students are trained in basic sciences and clinical practice and tested in skills and competence.

     

    This tradition of thorough education and training dates back to the first naturopaths that Benedict Lust trained a century ago.

     

    Unfortunately the term 'traditional naturopath' is now used by correspondence trained lay practitioners as a euphemism to describe their training and imply that they are closer to the tradition of naturopathy.   

     

    Ensure public safety

    CANP believes that

    •  In depth training is necessary in order to ensure public safety.

    •  Licensing or registration through the state is the most reliable method to ensure that adequate levels of training have been met for all practitioners of naturopathic medicine.

     

    Buyer Beware:

    As Colorado does not currently regulate naturopathy, the consumer is responsible for evaluating the credentials of any practitioner. Here are a few points to keep in mind:

     

    1. Licenses: The State of Colorado DOES NOT issue licenses or endorse licenses for naturopathic doctors. Any such licenses or certificates are not valid. The Colorado Attorney General's Office has issued cease and desist orders to the individuals producing these invalid Colorado licenses. [View Cease and Desist order]

    2. Accreditation: The Council on Naturopathic Medical Education (CNME) is the only agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education to accredit naturopathic educational programs. Other agencies claiming to accredit any naturopathic training programs lack recognition from any official state, federal, or educational agency. Only graduates from CNME accredited schools meet the educational requirements established by state regulatory boards for licensing applicants. The Colorado University of Naturopathic Medicine does not exist.

    3. Federal Licensure: The federal government does not issue licenses for naturopathy. Until recently the District of Columbia issued certificates to anyone registering as a naturopathic doctor with no requirement for residency or education. Anyone wanting a license could easily purchase one. Over twenty of these licenses have been issued to practitioners in Colorado . Although valid in Washington, DC at one time, these licenses are neither validations of competency nor permits to practice naturopathic medicine.

     

    The CANP believes that it is the state's responsibility to verify credentials, not the consumer's.

     

    • The Colorado consumer can easily be misled into believing a practitioner is a naturopathic doctor based on false or invalide credentials.
    • The 2005 DORA report by the State of Colorado itemizes a number of cases of injury that have resulted. [Click to read DORA Cases of Harm]
    • The CANP believes that regulation of naturopathic doctors is needed for consumer protection.
    • Allowing minimally trained persons to hold themselves out to the public as doctors is dangerous.
    • The average consumer is unable to tell who is a naturopathic doctor.
    • Diploma mills sell naturopathic degrees that are difficult to distinguish from genuine accredited degrees.

    View fake credentials used in Colorado (link)

    Information about diploma mills (link)

     

    The Brian O'Connell Case

     

    The story of Brian O'Connell, a practitioner from Wheatridge, Colorado,who pleaded guilty on February 2, 2006 to numerous charges, including manslaughter and is currently serving a 13 year prison sentence, is a tragic example of what can go wrong when the practice of naturopathy is unregulated.

     

    Additional news stories about Brian O'Connell, his arrest and conviction: (link)

     

     

    Rocky Mountain News

    Naturopath pleads guilty

    Trial ends soon after prosecutors uncover new evidence he lied

    By Sue Lindsay, Rocky Mountain News
    February 2, 2006

    The trial of a Wheat Ridge naturopathic practitioner ended abruptly Wednesday when he pleaded guilty after prosecutors uncovered new evidence that he had lied about his background under oath.

    Brian O'Connell, 37, faced numerous counts of practicing medicine without a license, theft and manslaughter in the death of a terminally ill 19-year-old cancer patient.....

    (link to rest of article)

     

                                                       *  *  *
    Facts about Brian O'Connell

    •  Brian O'Connell is not a naturopathic doctor

    Naturopathic doctors, as the term is used in the 14 states that license NDs, is used to describe people who have completed a U.S. Department of Education accredited 4-year graduate school of Naturopathic Medicine and have passed national board exams. This practitioner received his “degree” from an unaccredited six-week correspondence course.

     

    •  Brian O'Connell is not a member of CANP, nor could he be:

    The Colorado Association of Naturopathic Physicians has strict guidelines. All CANP members must:

    •  Graduate from a U.S. Department of Education accredited school of Naturopathic Medicine

    •  Take and pass state and national licensing board exams

    •  Be currently licensed in a jurisdiction that regulates the practice.

    •  Practice within the scope of that license.

     

     

     

    Furthermore:

    • The CANP notified the Department of Regulatory Agencies and the Colorado Attorney General's office of their concern about this practitioner months prior to his arrest.

     

    •  Photoluminescence, the procedure used by Brian O'Connell, in which he removed blood from the body, exposed it to UV radiation before returning it, is not within the scope of practice for naturopathic doctors in any state granting naturopathic licenses. The CANP requires their members to practice within the scope of their license. Therefore members of the CANP would not use or endorse the use of photoluminescence, the procedure which resulted in the death for which Brian O'Connell pleaded guilty to.

      New Video Andrew Weil and others speak on the value of naturopathic licensing: